Some time ago, I received this question regarding interpreting IRT cutscores (item response theory):
In my examination system, we are currently labeling ‘FAIL’ for student’s mark with below 50% and ‘PASS’ for 50% and above. I found that this amazing Xcalibre software can classify students’ achievement in 2 groups based on scores. But, when I tried to run IRT EPC with my data (with cut point of 0.5 selected), it shows that students with 24/40 correct items were classified as ‘FAIL’. Because in CTT, 24/40 correctly answered items is equal to 60% (Pass). I can’t find its interpretation in Guyer & Thompson (2013) User’s Manual for Xcalibre. How exactly should I set my cut point to perform 2-group classification using IRT EPC in Xcalibre to make it about equal to 50% achievement in CTT?
In this context, EPC refers to expected percent/proportion correct. IRT uses the test response function (TRF) to convert a theta score to an expectation of what percent of items in the pool that a student would answer correctly. So this Xcalibre user is wondering how to set IRT cutscores on theta that meets their needs.
Setting IRT cutscores
The short answer, in this case, would be to evaluate the TRF and reverse-calculate the theta for the cutscore. That is, find your desired cutscore on the y-axis, and determine the corresponding value of theta. In the example below, I have found a % cutscore of 54 and found the corresponding theta of -0.13 or so. In the case above, a theta=0.5 likely corresponded to a percent correct score of 60%-70%, so observed scores of 24/40 would indeed fail.
Of course, it is indefensible to set a cutscore to be arbitrary round numbers. To be defensible, you need to set the cutscore with an accepted methodology such as Angoff, modified-Angoff, Nedelsky, Bookmark, or Contrasting Groups.
A nice example is a the modified-Angoff, which is used extremely often in certification and licensure situations. More information is available on this method here. The result of this method will typically be a specific cutscore, either on the raw or percent metric. The TRF can be presented in both of those metrics, allowing the conversion on the right to be calculated easily.
Interested in applying IRT to improve your assessments? Download a free trial copy of Xcalibre here. If you want to deliver online tests that are scored directly with IRT, in real time (including computerized adaptive testing), check out FastTest.
Want to improve the quality of your assessments?
Sign up for our newsletter and hear about our free tools, product updates, and blog posts first! Don’t worry, we would never sell your email address, and we promise not to spam you with too many emails.
Latest posts by nthompson (see all)
- Tips to Improve Assessment Security During COVID-19 - September 4, 2020
- Responses in Common (RIC) - August 22, 2020
- Exact Errors in Common (EEIC) – Collusion Detection - August 22, 2020