Want to detect test cheating & suspicious behavior?

Try SIFT.

SIFT: Software for Investigating Fraud in Testing

Are you concerned with test cheating and other suspicious behavior? SIFT is free software that implements modern psychometric data forensics to help you find evidence of:

Item harvesting
Collusion (students cheating off each other)
Undue influence (e.g., teacher help)
Brain dump sites
Preknowledge
Low motivation

Download SIFT

First name*

Last name*

Email*

You must enter a valid email to receive the download link.

Organization*

Name of your company, university, or other organization.

What sort of tests do you work with?*

How did you hear about us?*

How many tests do you deliver each year?*

How many items are in your item bank?*

Do you use Item Response Theory?

How do you currently deliver assessments?*

Please keep me in the loop about more free resources and news in psychometrics and assessment.

Download for free

SIFT is available at no cost. We simply believe that test integrity is a vital component of validity, and encourage you to check the data. Please fill out the form and you will receive an automated email with a link to download SIFT. The download comes with example files and a detailed manual, which also provides explanations of the various analyses.

Because SIFT is free, it is provided without any support, training, or warranties.

SIFT is designed to bring advanced psychometric forensics to any testing organization. There is extensive scientific research on the topic, but if you wanted to do any of that analysis, you historically have had to write all the code yourself or hire an incredibly expensive consultant – until now!

Prefer an expert psychometrician to run SIFT, interpret results, and submit a professional report? We do that, too. Get in touch and we’d love to hear about your exams.

Types of test cheating analysis

Intra-examinee

Is there anything unusual about this examinee unrelated to everyone else? Did they answer “C” to every item? Did they spend 10 minutes on each of the first 5 items and skip the rest? Did they get a high score in a suspiciously short time?

Inter-examinee

Is there anything unusual about this examinee compared to others? Are there nearby examinees that have almost the same response vector? It’s not just whether other students got the same items wrong… but what if they chose the same wrong answers to those items?

Group-level

Group-level analysis provides additional insight. Do certain schools or teachers do unusually well? Do certain test centers have crazy-high pass rates but short test times on average?